Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Campaign Accelerator
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Strategizing
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Power with vs. Power Over ==== '''Power with:''' Sometimes we can create the change we need just by organizing our resources with others, creating power with them and without shifting power relationships with actors outside your community. For instance, creating a community credit union or a community run day care are examples of power with community organizing. '''Power over''': Sometimes others hold power over decisions or resources that we need in order to create change. In cases like these, we have to organize our power with others first in order to make a claim on the resources or decisions that will fulfill our interests. '''Note''': All organizing involves power with to some extent. Even when there is a problem involving power over your people, you will still need to create power with by organizing your community’s resources. When we have to engage those who have power over us in order to create change, we can ask ourselves five questions: # What is our goal? # What person or organization has the power to realize our goal? # What is that person or organization’s interests and vulnerabilities? # What resources do we have at our disposal (or can get)? # What strategies can we use to leverage those resources, and target their vulnerabilities, to achieve our goal? Once we have answered these questions, we’re one step closer to deciding on our strategy, which we can articulate in a theory of change statement. <div style="background-color:#eee; padding:1em; border:1px solid #ccc;"> ===== Resources ===== <p>Regardless of whether the problem is a power with or power over situation, identifying our community’s resources is key. For example, assume our people are local families whose problem is not being able to bring refugee relatives to Canada. Their resources include: their relationships in the community, volunteer time, their homes, their votes in elections, money, knowledge of the immigration system, stories about their family, contacts in government, and artistic skills. This community could use their money, time, relationships, knowledge of the immigration system and stories to fundraise money to sponsor their relatives through the immigration system. They could use artistic skills and stories to hold media stunts to shame government into making immigration policies more accessible. They could use their time, relationships and contacts in government to lobby the government to make changes to the laws. This community has many strategic options to pursue, but each is dependent on their resources and how they use them. As a result, knowing what their resources are is critical in identifying their theory of change.</p> </div>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Campaign Accelerator may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Campaign Accelerator:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Strategizing
(section)
Add topic